Pathology in Favour of Developing Countries:
Introduction:
The Italian NGO "Associazione Patologi Oltre
Frontiera" (APOF, "Pathologists Beyond Borders Association")
proposed the creation of the Working Group (WG) "Pathology in Favour of
Developing Countries" in 2010, with the goal of creating projects in
developing countries that focus on anatomic pathology and fostering local
preventive medicine initiatives.
The APOF planned a special session for the European Congress
of Pathology in Florence, Italy, the year before to present and discuss issues
pertaining to the management of surgical pathology in low-resource settings.
After that, the ESP made the decision to carry on and build on this experience
through a working group (WG) devoted solely to these subjects.
Research topic:
·
After 2015, the African
Association for Research and Training in Cancer (AORTIC), a significant
organisation founded in 1983 by African cancer care specialists working abroad,
joined APOF as a permanent partner of the organisation. The AORTIC's mission is
to support cancer control in Africa.
·
The major objective of this working group is to
provide space for colleagues from developing nations, allow them the chance to
share their professional expertise and academic research, and include European
pathologists in the creation of health cooperation programmes focused on
anatomic pathology. This is being done to maintain and broaden the synergy
among pathologists from various regions of the world who each provide unique
information.
·
While many developing nations struggle to offer even
the most basic pathology services, our ability to fine-tune diagnoses, and the
personalization of medicine, will inevitably lead to an increase in the
technological sophistication of our pathology laboratories, causing this health
care gap to widen even further. Many pathologists and medical specialists have
been motivated by this to try to close the gap.
·
In addition to many other industrialised
nations, the US, Canada, and other countries have a number of significant such
projects. However, because local conditions are typically complicated, efforts
to address them may run into problems on a range of fronts, from the
educational and cultural to the political and economic.
·
For pathologists, who are highly trained to
conduct intricate assessments on issues relating to a specific patient, a
disease, or pathobiologic
occurrences, this may be very intimidating. Our education does not
adequately educate us to deal with the social problems that the emerging world
faces.
·
Pathologists and even doctors face these
difficulties on a regular basis. Both the theoretical and practical components
of help have long caused the developed world to struggle, and significant
effort has been invested in this area.
·
Some contend that there is not much evidence to
support the $2.3 trillion that is estimated to have been spent on various aid
initiatives over the past five decades in Africa alone. 1 Others contend that
the effort has simply not been large enough, and that if rich nations invest
sufficiently, inequality and poverty will eventually be abolished because the
issues mainly revolve around a "poverty trap," whereby poor countries
stay poor because they are poor.
·
Economists have devoted a lot of time to examining a vast amount
of economic data in an effort to determine if foreign aid benefits, hinders, or
has no impact on economies. These economists may be employed by academic
institutions or by various international organisations.
·
There is disagreement on whether a "major
push"—a massive, centrally planned effort—is necessary or whether creative
individuals "on the ground"—what Easterly1 likes to refer to as
"Searchers"—will inevitably find the solution for developing nations.
Microcredit, a notion that Muhammad Yunus, the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize winner,
presented, is an illustration of the latter.
·
Not getting involved in this argument is not our
goal. However, it is advisable for any pathologist who wishes to participate in
underdeveloped nations to become acquainted with the problems.
·
The philosophical tenets are
more than only theoretically important; they also give one a framework within
which they would like to make a contribution and assist in understanding how
their efforts can fit into a bigger picture of assistance.
·
We have adopted the viewpoint in our own work
that the most beneficial contribution a Western-trained pathologist can make in
a low-resource environment—which yet will always have its own particular
strengths—is to react to local needs through teaching, training, and collegial
support.
Conclusion:
Pathologists,
in particular, are in severe demand in the majority of developing countries.
Despite the fact that there are typically 14 to 40 pathologists per million
people in North America and Europe, many poor nations only have a small
fraction of this, ranging from zero to low single digits. For instance,
Tanzania's 38 million inhabitants are served by 15 pathologists, whereas
Uganda's 28 million residents are served by 18 active pathologists. Structured
programmes are hard to come by and have a significant degree of variability in
training. Due to costs, training sessions are typically brief. Conversely,
trainees who are lucky enough to travel overseas and enrol in courses at
Western universities may find it challenging to put their new talents to use
when they get back home. This, together with economic incentives and employment
market realities, contributes to an excessively high rate of "brain
drain" from developing to developed nations, as Western nations
have historically relied largely on physicians with foreign training to meet
their own labour needs. Aside from the direct emigration, there is also an
indirect impact when nations with a high level of training, like South Africa,
lose their qualified staff to the West.
Contact Us:
Email Us: pathology@universeconferences.com
Recent Blog Posts:
·
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/enormous-breadth-liver-pathology-ms-gaur-priya |
Comments
Post a Comment